Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All articles submitted to Architectural Histories are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.

Architectural Histories operates a closed peer review process, meaning that reviewers remain anonymous. The review period is expected to take no longer than four weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports the handling editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. If major revisions are requested, then re-submitted files will be sent for a second round of review. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, who is supported by an expert, international Editorial Board.

 

Section Policies

Research Article

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Position Paper

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Review

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Interview

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Quick links